May 11, 2018 – M&H Wins Dog-Bite Case on Behalf of Animal Clinic

Contact Us

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information
disclaimer.

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.

close

Privacy Policy

In this premises liability action, the Appellate Division, First Judicial Department, in accordance with M&H’s arguments on appeal, applied precedent previously established by M&H (see, Doerr v. Goldsmith, 25 NY3d 1114 [2015]), and held that the Plaintiff could not recover damages from either the dog owner or the animal clinic because the dog had no known vicious propensities.

Easley v. The Animal Medical Center, et al